Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Reading Response

While reading through both assigned articles, it became clear to me of what purpose film festivals serve, or should serve rather, to a community. I refrain from using the term "artistic community" for reasons of artistic exclusion--which is exactly what film festivals should serve to tirelessly fight against. I believe that in popular cinema's present situation, with mind numbing budgets, huge marketing plans, and a star system that never quits, film festivals seem to be the only outlet for filmmakers who are attempting to show their work for larger venues--to an unbiased audience that has a chance to critique and ask questions. In return, filmmakers are given a prime opportunity to network, and a community is given an opportunity to flourish in a form of art and entertainment that they would never be able to experience at the local multiplex. It is widely accepted that film is always in a progression, whether from a technological, cultural, or ideological standing. With this in mind, as well as what is referred to as 'popular cinema,' it may be concluded that films screened at film festivals are the first small tastes of new cinematic tendencies, and serve as an outlet for risk taking and exploration that a multi-billion dollar industry might not see as a wise business decision. In relationship to Visions Film Festival and Conference, the idea of melding filmmakers and scholars and exposing them in the festival limelight so early in their careers is exciting and equally beneficial. Festivals are so important to films progress in general, and Visions is creating that serious opportunity for a younger filmmaker, while never forcing them to leave a learning environment, but challenging them nonetheless.

No comments:

Post a Comment